In the article, “Developing Sustainable Infrastructure in New Cities”, Cho (2014) states that sustainability needs to be ranked first to adapt to the extreme urban context in the 21st century. The author mentions that “Envision Sustainability Rating System” is designed to monitor the performance of an infrastructure through the ability, flexibility and the usefulness to last from a present project. The writer states that both Mexico and Peru uses sustainable techniques to construct their highways which has served the community well by overcoming these challenges such as “rising energy prices, water shortages, traffic congestions and etc.”, in rapid urbanization. The author hopes to provide a holistic vision through the King Abdullah Economic City (KAEC) and that new city around the world will use these guidelines to strategize their new infrastructures. I agree to some extent in the importance of achieving sustainable infrastructure, however, the author fails to express if all countries will be able to use the KAEC fellowship guidelines, the rating system as well as the considerations to take note of, besides the factors mentioned for sustainable efforts in the long run.
I feel that the article shows great detail in telling readers about the needs of sustainable infrastructures to ensure continuity of use. As rapid urbanization is taking place, sustainability carries an important role in ensuring that the wellbeing of the citizens, improving environmental challenges and economic growth for the country is met. Looking at the framework from the “King Abdullah Economic City (KAEC) fellowship”, it serves as an option for countries in the region to look at the results at a wider view. With a rating system put in place, people will be able to monitor the “resilience and the performance” of their infrastructures and also competitiveness at a global level. In rapid urbanization, sustainability is often misunderstood for being expensive to build and countries feel that they should stick to conventional methods in constructions, overlooking the long-term goals. As sustainability suggest, I feel that one needs to understand the purpose well, before any companies commit to it fully.
While I agree with the author’s main point on transportation infrastructure, the author states that the “new accreditation system that prioritizes the sustainability of infrastructure, such as roads, bridges, pipelines, stormwater systems, landfills, treatment and other systems that help cities function as a whole.” I feel that sustainable new cities should also concentrate on other infrastructures altogether, although an effective transport system is the backbone to every modern economy. While smart cities surface, sustainable infrastructure is seen as one of the economic motivators and part of a new economic model adopted by many cities around the world. It will require years of planning, innovative thinking and approach to integrate the techniques of sustainable infrastructures and designs.
The writer also fails to mention that sustainable efforts is not constraint within infrastructure and according to World Bank Group (2013), sustainability efforts by the leaders must “also figure out how they will provide affordable homes, transportation, jobs, and basic infrastructure and services necessary to support the ballooning urban populations”. Global awareness needs to set in to ensure that the city leaders know what sustainability is about and how they can implement it in their country’s context. Space constraints or limitations within the city can also potentially hinder the improvement of the infrastructures in the cities, e.g. existing infrastructures. In order to fully benefit from constructing sustainable infrastructures without compromising with environmental factors and the community adversely, checking against other available rating systems such as “Leadership in Energy And Environmental Design (LEED)” or “Green Mark Rating (by Building Construction Authority Singapore)”. Countries expressing interest in this may also consider the ways to finance their infrastructures of their projects, to monitor the performance and the needs to maintain the systems.
In conclusion, developing sustainable infrastructures in new cities is important to foster a connection between the people and the economy, it is also paramount for the government leaders to assess the effective plans and finance for the new infrastructures. It also allows more revenue to the country and to experience lesser maintenance issues with more continuity of use. Sustainability performance through different forms of rating systems also gives countries a platform to recognize their efforts in restoring capital and ecosystems. Therefore, world leaders need to scrutinize the different guidelines that is widely provided carefully, before constructing their infrastructures.
word count: 546 without summary.
References:
Envisioning Smart Cities through Sustainable Infrastructure, by Meghna Tare, 2 April 2014 on Weekly News Roundup.
http://cityminded.org/envisioning-smart-cities-sustainable-infrastructure-10385
Sustainable Infrastructure by GIZ
https://www.giz.de/en/ourservices/sustainable_infrastructure.html
What City Leaders Need to Know as Countries Rapidly Urbanize, by The World Bank Group on 22 January 2013.
Edited.
aiweimomo 
With a rating system *omit “put”* in place, people will be able to monitor the “resilience and the performance” of their infrastructures and also competitiveness at a global level.
While smart cities *surface*, sustainable infrastructure is seen as one of the economic motivators and part of a new economic model *that are* adopted by many cities around the world.
Countries expressing interest in this *may also* need to consider the ways to finance their infrastructures of their projects, to monitor the performance and the needs to maintain the systems.
Therefore, world leaders need to *omit “look”* scrutinize the different guidelines that is widely provided carefully, before constructing their infrastructures.
LikeLike